GLIMPSEGRASPEXPLOREDEEP DIVE
Glimpse · How does change happen?

Theory of Change

A Theory of Change can provide a clear causal structure. In complex landscapes, the Playbook treats its causal links as explicit propositions to be tested and refined through release, observe and adjust: sense the system, find where it has give, introduce a purposeful proposition and learn from the response.

Heading is compositeThe system’s direction emerges from many strands and their interactions, not from one actor’s plan.
Intervention has a dual taskWork on regulatory space and on the meanings, materials and competencies of practice.
Ripple is not yet durabilityEffects dependent on the intervention must become self-reinforcing cascades if they are to outlast it.
INTERVENTIONTEAMripple → cascadeAlternative Heading
Direction is clear; pathways can adapt.The team releases foments into opportunity points, senses response and continually revises both action and understanding.
Grasp · The causal cycle

Release. Observe. Adjust.

The cycle does not abandon causality. It makes causal claims explicit as propositions and holds them open to evidence.

Assemble the theory

Eight ideas work together.

Heading

The composite direction produced by the trajectories of multiple strands.

Strands

Actor groups and the practices through which each shapes the landscape over time.

Interaction spaces

Where strands meet, regulate one another, collide, cooperate or avoid contact.

Opportunity points

Conditions where the system has enough give for a well-placed intervention to matter.

Foments

Bounded, purposeful propositions introduced to stimulate and read a response.

Ripple and cascade

Early effects may remain dependent on the intervention or become self-reinforcing.

The team

A new strand entering the system, carrying resources, relationships and regulatory weight.

Sensing

The continuous practice that makes every other part of the theory usable.

The dual task: regulatory space without practice-level work leaves an opening that nothing fills; practice-level work without regulatory space often snaps back.
Explore · What did the system do?

Distinguish ripple from cascade.

Both are change. Only one can continue without the intervention doing the work.

Dampened response
Dampened responseA small disturbance meets opposing feedback. Nearby actors respond briefly, then return to the existing pattern.Foment
The disturbance is absorbed; the existing pattern holds.

The system absorbs the disturbance and returns towards its previous pattern. This is useful information about the feedback, power or practice configuration holding the pattern in place.

Next question: Do not keep repeating the same action merely because it was planned. Re-read the opportunity point.

Ripple
RippleWaves spread out from the original foment and weaken. Nearby actors respond most. Further waves still come from the original intervention.Foment
The effect spreads, but still relies on the original push.

A visible effect travels while the intervention remains active. Actors respond, language changes or a practice begins to shift, but momentum still depends on project presence or resources.

Next question: Ask what additional foment, relationship or institutional change could reduce that dependence.

Cascade
CascadeThe original foment activates a chain of actors. Each response carries change onward; a branch and a feedback loop reinforce it. The intervention no longer supplies every push.FomentEach response can trigger another
Responses generate further change through the system’s own feedback.

The effect becomes self-reinforcing. Actors or interaction spaces not directly targeted begin to change because system feedback is now carrying the effect.

Next question: Check direction and distribution before amplifying: a cascade can spread harm as readily as benefit.

Deep dive · The honest epistemology

Plan clearly, stay open to evidence.

What the intervention can commit to

That it will sense deliberately, make its propositions explicit, introduce bounded action, observe effects, protect ethical guardrails and change course when evidence requires it.

What remains uncertain

The exact direction of every perturbation, that its initial system read is correct, that every foment will work or that the final pathway will resemble the proposal.

Success combines accountability for agreed objectives with evidence that causal assumptions are being tested and refined as the landscape responds.

Continue through connected concepts

Deep dive

Read the full Theory of Change chapter.

The full reading edition carries the complete argument, examples, references and methodological detail behind this page.

Open full chapter PDF →

Return to concept map →