A direction to steer by – not a destination to predict.
An Alternative Heading is the nearer, revisable bearing an intervention uses to influence a landscape’s present trajectory in a more integrated social-ecological direction.
A vision and an Alternative Heading can do different jobs.
The Playbook’s practical concern is not with aspiration itself, but with treating a distant imagined future as if it were a predictable programme destination.
New evidence should be able to move the arrow.
Click through common moments that may require the team to revise its route, sequence or bearing.
Make the direction clear enough to guide the next decision.
What patterns, power relations and practices are currently dominating the landscape’s trajectory?
What should become more or less possible, rewarded, connected or mutually regulated?
How would the direction improve social-ecological integration rather than benefit one strand alone?
What evidence suggests movement is possible, and where does the system currently have give?
What early changes in practices, relationships, power or feedback would suggest the heading is shifting?
What evidence, harm or system response would make the team reconsider the bearing?
Evidence-based course correction is part of adaptive delivery.
Schedule explicit review moments within the programme’s governance arrangements, and use accumulated learning from foments, monitoring and landscape conversations to assess whether the bearing should be refined.
Does the initial heading still match the regulatory architecture the team has mapped?
Are responses revealing a more plausible or less harmful route?
Have new actors, crises or decisions changed what is possible or legitimate?
Is the promising effect genuinely aligned, or are costs and exclusions being hidden?
Continue through connected concepts
Read the full Alternative Heading chapter.
The full reading edition carries the complete argument, examples, references and methodological detail behind this page.