A place at the table is not enough: Accountability for Indigenous Peoples and local communities in multi-stakeholder platforms
Can multi-stakeholder forums mediate indigenous rights and development priorities? Insights from the Peruvian Amazon
How Are Land-Use Multi-stakeholder Fora Affected by Their Contexts?
Introduction – Multi-stakeholder forums and the promise of more equitable and sustainable land and resource use: perspectives from Brazil, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and Peru
The role of multi-stakeholder forums in subnational jurisdictions: Framing literature review for in-depth field research
The meeting of multiple governmentalities and technologies of participation in protected areas: The case of the Amarakaeri Communal Reserve (Peruvian Amazon)
Multistakeholder platforms for natural resource governance: lessons from eight landscape-level cases
Organizing for transformation? How and why organizers plan their multi-stakeholder forums
Understanding Difference to Build Bridges among Stakeholders
This study analyses the perspectives of participants and organizers in Peruvian Amazon multi-stakeholder forums (MSFs) using Q-methodology. It reveals nuanced perceptions, highlighting optimism, risk awareness, and challenges in addressing inequality. The findings offer insights for constructing more effective and equitable MSFs.